AfPA Releases New White Paper on Biologics

December 19, 2012

The Alliance for Patient Access National Physicians Biologics Working Group released a white paper entitled, “Biologics: Can Patients Get What the Doctor Orders?” The paper examines barriers to therapeutic access resulting from current healthcare benefits design. This is a second in a series of papers designed as an educational resource to inform the public and policymakers about the benefits of biologics, what makes them unique and distinct from conventional pharmaceuticals, and why these distinctions matter.

To learn more about the National Physicians Biologics Working Group please visit www.Biologicsdoc.org.

Read the paper here.


AfPA Releases New White Paper on Biologics

December 19, 2012

The Alliance for Patient Access National Physicians Biologics Working Group released a white paper entitled, “Biologics: Can Patients Get What the Doctor Orders?” The paper examines barriers to therapeutic access resulting from current healthcare benefits design. This is a second in a series of papers designed as an educational resource to inform the public and policymakers about the benefits of biologics, what makes them unique and distinct from conventional pharmaceuticals, and why these distinctions matter.

To learn more about the National Physicians Biologics Working Group please visit www.Biologicsdoc.org.

Read the paper here.


Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Colorado BioScience and the Biotechnology Industry Organization Host Biosimiars Forum in Colorado

December 10, 2012

DENVER – The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM), Colorado BioScience and Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) hosted a Biosimilars Education Forum in Longmont, CO, on December 6th following a tour of a facility that manufactures biologic medicines. The forum brought together policymakers, patient advocates, physicians, pharmacists and other stakeholders who discussed the importance of patient safety as biosimilars are introduced in the United States.

ASBM Chairmain, Dr. Richard Dolinar participated in a panel discussion with Andrew Spiegel, CEO of the Colon Cancer Alliance, Philip Schneider, Associate Dean of the College of Pharmacy Administration at the University of Arizona and Fritz Bittenbender, Vice President of Alliance Development and State Government Affairs at BIO.

The manufacturing tour and forum were part of an ongoing ASBM education campaign intended to highlight the complex nature of biologics, the precise methods and processes required to manufacture them and the challenges present in the attempt to replicate them.

“As a practicing physician, I am often reminded of the differences biologics can make in the lives of my patients, but today was an eye-opening experience as I witnessed firsthand the immense detail and the stringent standards that are required to ensure that biologics are safe and effective,” said Dr. Dolinar. “ASBM has been very supportive of the FDA’s efforts and we believe that by holding forums across the country and engaging physicians, pharmacists, patients and policymakers we will be better able to provide the FDA with solutions to some of the complex patient-safety challenges biosimilars present for manufacturers and regulators alike, but also to remind us all of the promise they will offer to patients in the U.S. once available.”

Biologics are used to treat cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and other debilitating diseases. On February 9, 2012, the FDA announced the publication of draft guidance documents relating to the developments of biosimilars, which are similar to, but not exact copies of biologics. The guidance documents were a significant step in establishing a biosimilars pathway and as the FDA moves forward, ASBM will continue to work to ensure patient safety remains the priority.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently developing a regulatory pathway that will ensure biosimilars are safe for patients as they are introduced in the U.S.

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion. Visit us at www.SafeBiologics.org.


Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Colorado BioScience and the Biotechnology Industry Organization Host Biosimiars Forum in Colorado

December 10, 2012

DENVER – The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM), Colorado BioScience and Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) hosted a Biosimilars Education Forum in Longmont, CO, on December 6th following a tour of a facility that manufactures biologic medicines. The forum brought together policymakers, patient advocates, physicians, pharmacists and other stakeholders who discussed the importance of patient safety as biosimilars are introduced in the United States.

ASBM Chairmain, Dr. Richard Dolinar participated in a panel discussion with Andrew Spiegel, CEO of the Colon Cancer Alliance, Philip Schneider, Associate Dean of the College of Pharmacy Administration at the University of Arizona and Fritz Bittenbender, Vice President of Alliance Development and State Government Affairs at BIO.

The manufacturing tour and forum were part of an ongoing ASBM education campaign intended to highlight the complex nature of biologics, the precise methods and processes required to manufacture them and the challenges present in the attempt to replicate them.

“As a practicing physician, I am often reminded of the differences biologics can make in the lives of my patients, but today was an eye-opening experience as I witnessed firsthand the immense detail and the stringent standards that are required to ensure that biologics are safe and effective,” said Dr. Dolinar. “ASBM has been very supportive of the FDA’s efforts and we believe that by holding forums across the country and engaging physicians, pharmacists, patients and policymakers we will be better able to provide the FDA with solutions to some of the complex patient-safety challenges biosimilars present for manufacturers and regulators alike, but also to remind us all of the promise they will offer to patients in the U.S. once available.”

Biologics are used to treat cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and other debilitating diseases. On February 9, 2012, the FDA announced the publication of draft guidance documents relating to the developments of biosimilars, which are similar to, but not exact copies of biologics. The guidance documents were a significant step in establishing a biosimilars pathway and as the FDA moves forward, ASBM will continue to work to ensure patient safety remains the priority.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently developing a regulatory pathway that will ensure biosimilars are safe for patients as they are introduced in the U.S.

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion. Visit us at www.SafeBiologics.org.


ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

November 30, 2012

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

The paper titled ‘It’s all about the name: what is the imperative of adopting unique names for biologic and biosimilar therapeutics?’ explains the ASBM’s position that in order to ensure patient safety as biosimilars are approved in the US, they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

Read full article at Generics and Biosimilars Initiative (GaBI)


ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

November 30, 2012

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

The paper titled ‘It’s all about the name: what is the imperative of adopting unique names for biologic and biosimilar therapeutics?’ explains the ASBM’s position that in order to ensure patient safety as biosimilars are approved in the US, they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

Read full article at Generics and Biosimilars Initiative (GaBI)


FDLI publishes ASBM White Paper on biosimilar naming

November 29, 2012

The Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) Policy Forum published a white paper on biosimilar naming authored by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM).

The white paper is titled, “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names for Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” and explains that biologic medicines are different than traditional chemical drugs, and present unique safety concerns to patients. Because of this fact the paper notes that in order to ensure patient-safety as biosimilars are approved in the U.S., they must be given unique, non-proprietary names.

Read the full article at Biosimilar News


ASBM Says Distinct USAN Names for Biosimilars are Needed

November 29, 2012

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (“ASBM“), a self-described “organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion,” urges FDA in a new paper to adopt unique non-proprietary names for all biological products licensed under the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”), and in particular biosimilar versions of reference products (even those that are interchangeable).

Read full article at FDA Law Blog


ASBM Says Distinct USAN Names for Biosimilars are Needed

November 29, 2012

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (“ASBM“), a self-described “organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion,” urges FDA in a new paper to adopt unique non-proprietary names for all biological products licensed under the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”), and in particular biosimilar versions of reference products (even those that are interchangeable).

Read full article at FDA Law Blog


ASBM Paper on Biosimilar Naming Published in the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Policy Forum

November 28, 2012

Unique names key factor to ensure patient-safety in biosimilar pathway

WASHINGTON – The Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) Policy Forum today published a white paper on biosimilar naming authored by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM). “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names For Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” explains that in order to ensure patient-safety as biosimilars are approved in the U.S., they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

In the paper, ASBM makes four policy recommendations:

  1. All biologics should receive distinct non-proprietary names.
  2. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) should work with FDA to adapt the product monograph system to accommodate the unique attributes of structurally-related, but distinct, biologic medicines.
  3. The non-proprietary name of a reference product and product/s biosimilar to it should have a common, shared root but have distinct and differentiating suffixes.
  4. Products designated interchangeable should have a distinct name from the reference product for which they are considered interchangeable to facilitate accurate attribution of adverse events.

“As an organization, ASBM has been working with our diverse membership and Advisory Board that represents patients, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, manufacturers and academics to support the FDA as they work to bring biosimilars to patients in the U.S.,” said Dr. Richard Dolinar, ASBM Chairman. “Naming has been a prominent biosimilar safety issue and we are honored to be featured in FDLI’s publication and hope that this paper helps identify the challenges and solutions we need to take into consideration.”

FDLI’s Food and Drug Policy Forum is a concise (approximately 10 page), twice-a-month, peer-reviewed, digital publication on current food and drug policy topics. Posed in the form of a question, each issue provides subscribers and purchasers with pertinent background information, relevant research, a discussion of central issues, relevant resources, and policy recommendations.

Read the paper here.

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion. We serve as an authoritative resource center of information for the public, medical communities, the FDA and other state and federal policymakers during the implementation of the biosimilars pathway and beyond.

About the Food and Drug Law Institute
The Food and Drug Law Institute, founded in 1949, is a non-profit organization that provides a marketplace for discussing food and drug law issues through conferences, publications and member interaction. The scope of FDLI includes food, drugs, animal drugs, biologics, cosmetics, diagnostics, dietary supplements, medical devices and tobacco. As a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization, FDLI does not engage in advocacy activities. FDLI’s Mission is to provide education, training, and publications on topical food and drug law; act as a liaison to promote networking as a means to develop professional relationships and idea generation; and ensure an open, balanced marketplace of ideas to inform innovative public policy, law, and regulation.

 


logo logo logo