IAPO Mexico City Meeting Includes Discussion on Biosimilars

September 23, 2013

On September 23rd, in Mexico City, the International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO) hosted a discussion on biosimilars at their Latin American Multi-Stakeholder Seminar.  The meeting was attended by patient and interest groups from the region as well as ASBM Executive Director, Michael Reilly, and Global Colon Cancer Association (GCCA) Co-Executive Director, Andy Spiegel.

The discussion focused on how patient groups can influence biosimilar health policy in Latin American countries, especially Mexico and Columbia, and the need for stringent global regulatory standards that ensure patient safety when it comes to these complex medicines.

ASBM Steering Committee member, GCCA, has officially joined the International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO) this year. The Mexico City event served as an opportunity to build on IAPO’s interest in the biosimilars issue following the successful Workshop on Biosimilars Medicines held in Geneva earlier in the year. IAPO is a global alliance of over 200 patients’ organizations representing 50 disease areas and over 60 countries worldwide.


The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines Statement on the Need for Unique Names for All Biologic Medicines

September 20, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC – Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) chairman, Richard Dolinar M.D., added a physician’s perspective to the ongoing discussion around the naming of biologic medicines, including biosimilars.

“Biologics are highly sensitive to the manufacturing process and their environment; slight differences can have unexpected results,” stated Dolinar. “As a physician, patient safety is paramount. I need to know as quickly as possible when and which product is associated with an unexpected outcome in order to treat my patients effectively. Importantly, identical names imply identical products, which will not be the case when biologics are made using different manufacturing processes and/or cell lines. If distinct non-proprietary names are not given to products, we may waste valuable treatment time trying to identify which medicine was actually the root cause, and the patient will suffer.”

Dolinar stressed that unique distinguishable non-proprietary names play a central role in pharmacovigilance and traceability systems that enable clearer communication with patients, medical staff and pharmacists. A white paper authored by ASBM entitled, “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names For Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” explains how biologic medicines are different from traditional chemical drugs and present unique safety concerns.

“Our research in the United States clearly indicates that physicians familiar with biologics know minor changes can make a big difference for sick patients,” said Dolinar.  “Instituting a system of unique names for biologic medicines will achieve the common goal of enhancing access to life-changing therapies, while also protecting the safety of the patients,” Dolinar concluded.

ASBM called for the use of distinguishable names in a March 20th letter directly to Dr. Balocco Mattavelli, INN Program Manager at the WHO.  Dr. Dolinar has also presented at the “Regulator Forum on Biologic Naming and Traceability” hosted by Health Canada and BIOTECanada on June 26, 2013 that Dr. Balocco attended. ASBM’s most recent statement was sent to Dr. Margaret Chang, WHO Director-General, on July 31, 2013 in advance of their upcoming 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. ASBM will also be present at that meeting to be held in Geneva on October 22, 2013.

# # #

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines:
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion.

For more information, please contact:
http://safebiologics.org/naming.php
Michael Reilly
Executive Director
Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
Phone: 202-222-8326
E: Michael@safebiologics.org


The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines Statement on the Need for Unique Names for All Biologic Medicines

September 20, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC – Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) chairman, Richard Dolinar M.D., added a physician’s perspective to the ongoing discussion around the naming of biologic medicines, including biosimilars.

“Biologics are highly sensitive to the manufacturing process and their environment; slight differences can have unexpected results,” stated Dolinar. “As a physician, patient safety is paramount. I need to know as quickly as possible when and which product is associated with an unexpected outcome in order to treat my patients effectively. Importantly, identical names imply identical products, which will not be the case when biologics are made using different manufacturing processes and/or cell lines. If distinct non-proprietary names are not given to products, we may waste valuable treatment time trying to identify which medicine was actually the root cause, and the patient will suffer.”

Dolinar stressed that unique distinguishable non-proprietary names play a central role in pharmacovigilance and traceability systems that enable clearer communication with patients, medical staff and pharmacists. A white paper authored by ASBM entitled, “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names For Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” explains how biologic medicines are different from traditional chemical drugs and present unique safety concerns.

“Our research in the United States clearly indicates that physicians familiar with biologics know minor changes can make a big difference for sick patients,” said Dolinar.  “Instituting a system of unique names for biologic medicines will achieve the common goal of enhancing access to life-changing therapies, while also protecting the safety of the patients,” Dolinar concluded.

ASBM called for the use of distinguishable names in a March 20th letter directly to Dr. Balocco Mattavelli, INN Program Manager at the WHO.  Dr. Dolinar has also presented at the “Regulator Forum on Biologic Naming and Traceability” hosted by Health Canada and BIOTECanada on June 26, 2013 that Dr. Balocco attended. ASBM’s most recent statement was sent to Dr. Margaret Chang, WHO Director-General, on July 31, 2013 in advance of their upcoming 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances. ASBM will also be present at that meeting to be held in Geneva on October 22, 2013.

# # #

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines:
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion.

For more information, please contact:
http://safebiologics.org/naming.php
Michael Reilly
Executive Director
Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
Phone: 202-222-8326
E: Michael@safebiologics.org


July – August / Summer 2013 Newsletter

August 27, 2013

Dolinar Authors Second Letter to WHO on Naming

ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, M.D., submitted a letter on July 31, 2013, to Dr. Margaret Chan, World Health Organization Director-General to reiterate ASBM’s position on the importance of using distinct non-proprietary names to ensure patient safety. The letter was sent to Dr. Chan and to the INN Expert Group, Department of Essential Medicines & Health Products, and the Health Systems & Innovation Division at the WHO in advance of their upcoming 57th Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances to be held in Geneva on October 22, 2013.

Read letter here.

In addition to the letter to Dr. Chan, ASBM also formally requested to participate in the October 22nd meeting in Geneva.


Biosimilars Legislative Update – California

While most U.S. state legislative sessions have died down for the summer, California is nearing the finish line to pass vital patient safety legislation concerning biosimilars.

Senate Bill 598 has received a favorable position in the California Assembly, passing the Health Committee; the Business, Professions and Consumer Protection Committee; and the Appropriations Committee by favorable margins. The bill was considered by the full Assembly Monday, August 26th and passed with an overwhelming vote of 58-4. It now returns to the Senate for hopeful completion before the CA session ends on September 13th.


Global Colon Cancer Alliance Joins IAPO

ASBM Steering Committee member, Global Colon Cancer Alliance (GCCA) has officially joined the International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO). IAPO is a global alliance of over 200 patients’ organizations representing 50 disease areas and over 60 countries worldwide. IAPO works in a creative and innovative way towards its vision of patient-centered healthcare and has a network that connects over 4,000 organizations and an estimated 365 million patients worldwide. GCCA will now officially be part of a larger, international network providing new opportunities to speak on colon cancer issues and well as share their thoughts on biosimilars.


IAPO to Discuss Biosimilars at Mexico City Regional Meeting

IAPO’s Governing Board Member, Eva Maria Ruiz de Castilla, will feature a discussion on biosimilars during IAPO’s upcoming Latin American Multi-Stakeholder Seminar, September 23rd in Mexico City. The seminar will continue to advance IAPO’s primary mission which is to inform and engage patient groups so that they can better advocate for patient-centered policies worldwide. The Mexico City event serves as an opportunity to build on IAPO’s interest in the biosimilars issue following the successful Workshop on Biosimilars Medicines held in Geneva earlier in the year. The Geneva workshop brought together 19 patients’ organizations and other healthcare stakeholders from around the world to discuss what biosimilars are and what they mean to patients. ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly and GCCA Co-Executive Director Andy Spiegel presented at the Geneva Workshop and are planning to attend the Mexico City seminar as well.


NALEO to Focus on Biosimilars at Legislative Summit

The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) is hosting their Legislative Summit on Health, October 25-27 in Las Vegas, NV. The October summit will focus on The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and will include a session focused on biosimilars.

NALEO is the nation’s leading non-profit organization that facilitates the full participation of Latinos in the American political process. Currently, NALEO represents more than 6,000 Latino elected and appointed officials and conducts advocacy on issues important to their community.


Australia Releases Guidance on Biosimilars

Building on similar European documents, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) recently released guidance to help drugmakers identify the data necessary to support the registration of biosimilars, in-Pharma Technologist reports. The TGA clarifies the scientific and regulatory requirements needed to bring biosimilars to the Australian market, which includes that manufacturers have to provide evidence that they have established in-house reference standards comparable to the reference biologic.

Read full article here.


AADA’s Board of Directors Updates Position on Biosimilars

ASBM Steering Committee member, American Academy of Dermatology, has formally updated their position statement on biosimilars. The Board of Directors approved changes on August 3rd. Those changes are based on a better understanding of legislation under consideration in many of the U.S. states, as well as the FDA’s possible approach in approving and regulating biosimilars. Specifically, the Board has included that “the pharmacist notifies the prescriber in writing or electronic communication by the time of dispensing.”

To view full statement click here.


IFPMA Launches New Publication on the Scientific & Regulatory Considerations of Biosimilars

The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA) has recently published, “Similar Biotherapeutic Products – Scientific & Regulatory Considerations”. The piece includes a visual timeline of the development and manufacturing process of these products, as well as a unique illustration of how the biotech process works. Furthermore, the publication explains the science behind biotherapeutics and how they are not the same as chemically-synthesized molecules, which have a simpler chemical structure. This in-depth, yet easy to digest, publication helps to explain the concerns of the quality, safety, and efficacy issues faced in manufacturing biologics and in any biosimilar product.

Access publication here.


Upcoming DIA Conferences You Won’t Want to Miss

The Drug Information Association (DIA) will soon be hosting two forums on biologics in the Greater Washington, DC area.

The Development of Live Biotherapeutics: September 24, Hilton- Washington DC, Rockville, MD. This conference is set to provide a better understanding of the unique opportunities and challenges in the development of live biotherapeutics that will enable more translational research to move forward into therapeutics.

Click here for more information.

DIA Biosimilars 2013: November 13-14, Hyatt Regency, Bethesda, MD. This seminar is focused on supporting the growing sector of biosimilars. The meeting will focus on the challenges, innovations and technologies surrounding biosimilars.

Click here for more information.


ASBM Newsletter Now Available on the Web

ASBM newsletters are now on the web! All newsletters for the 2013 calendar year have been posted for easier reference and to share the exciting activities of ASBM. This one-stop update can be accessed on the bottom right-hand corner of the homepage or under the media toolbar. Join us in sharing this link with other allies in your community.

Click here to see the ASBM newsletter section.


ASBM Authors Second Letter to WHO on Naming

August 26, 2013

ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, MD recently submitted another letter on naming to the World Health Organization Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan, as well as the INN Expert Group, Department of Essential Medicines & Health Products, and the Health Systems & Innovation division at WHO.  The second letter is a result of ASBM’s keen interst in the 56th Consultaion on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances, which was held in May,  as well as the positive feedback ASBM received from Dr. Raffaella Balocco, INN Program Manager.

Read letter here.

 


ASBM Authors Second Letter to WHO on Naming

August 26, 2013

ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, MD recently submitted another letter on naming to the World Health Organization Director-General, Dr. Margaret Chan, as well as the INN Expert Group, Department of Essential Medicines & Health Products, and the Health Systems & Innovation division at WHO.  The second letter is a result of ASBM’s keen interst in the 56th Consultaion on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances, which was held in May,  as well as the positive feedback ASBM received from Dr. Raffaella Balocco, INN Program Manager.

Read letter here.

 


American Academy of Dermatology Updates Biosimilar Statement

August 15, 2013

This month, the AADA’s Board of Directors approved an updated version of their position statement on biosimilars.  The AADA specifically adds new language to clarify physician notification by pharmacists. Read full statement here.


American Academy of Dermatology Updates Biosimilar Statement

August 15, 2013

This month, the AADA’s Board of Directors approved an updated version of their position statement on biosimilars.  The AADA specifically adds new language to clarify physician notification by pharmacists. Read full statement here.


European Medicines Agency recommends approval of first two monoclonal-antibody biosimilars

July 29, 2013

Recommendation marks extension of biosimilar concept to new product class

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended granting of marketing authorisations for the first two monoclonal-antibody biosimilars.

Remsima and Inflectra both contain the same known active substance, infliximab. In the application dossiers, they have been shown to be similar to the biological medicine Remicade, a monoclonal antibody that has been authorised in the European Union since 1999. Remsima and Inflectra are recommended for authorisation in the same indications as Remicade, covering a range of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and and psoriasis.

Monoclonal antibodies are structurally complex substances that can locate and bind to specific molecules, in the case of infliximab to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, a protein promoting inflammatory response, which causes many of the clinical problems associated with auto-immune disorders. It is the first time that the biosimilar concept has been successfully applied to such a complex molecule, resulting in the recommended approval of a biosimilar version of infliximab. The biosimilar concept foresees that a biological medicine can be authorised if it can be demonstrated that it is a close copy of a biological medicine that has already been authorised for use in the European Union.

Since the approval of the first biosimilar medicine in Europe in 2006, the regulatory framework in place for the approval of biosimilars has produced a total of 12 authorised biosimilar medicines. The framework consists of a number of overarching guidelines which define and describe key concepts of biosimilar development programmes. The overarching guidelines are complemented by product-specific guidelines, which give more detailed guidance to applicants in relation to the respective class of products.

The product-specific guideline for monoclonal antibodies has been in force since December 2012. As for all biosimilars, the emphasis in the development programme is on demonstrating comparability to the reference medicine. An applicant has to submit studies to the Agency that show that the medicine is a biosimilar of the reference medicine, i.e. that it does not have any meaningful differences from the reference medicine in terms of its quality, safety and efficacy.

Applicants are also required to implement a risk-management plan to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of a biosimilar, including the detection of any unexpected rare adverse effects when the medicine is used in clinical practice.

The CHMP opinions on Remsima and Inflectra will now be sent to the European Commission for adoption of a marketing-authorisation decision.


European Medicines Agency recommends approval of first two monoclonal-antibody biosimilars

July 29, 2013

Recommendation marks extension of biosimilar concept to new product class

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended granting of marketing authorisations for the first two monoclonal-antibody biosimilars.

Remsima and Inflectra both contain the same known active substance, infliximab. In the application dossiers, they have been shown to be similar to the biological medicine Remicade, a monoclonal antibody that has been authorised in the European Union since 1999. Remsima and Inflectra are recommended for authorisation in the same indications as Remicade, covering a range of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and and psoriasis.

Monoclonal antibodies are structurally complex substances that can locate and bind to specific molecules, in the case of infliximab to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, a protein promoting inflammatory response, which causes many of the clinical problems associated with auto-immune disorders. It is the first time that the biosimilar concept has been successfully applied to such a complex molecule, resulting in the recommended approval of a biosimilar version of infliximab. The biosimilar concept foresees that a biological medicine can be authorised if it can be demonstrated that it is a close copy of a biological medicine that has already been authorised for use in the European Union.

Since the approval of the first biosimilar medicine in Europe in 2006, the regulatory framework in place for the approval of biosimilars has produced a total of 12 authorised biosimilar medicines. The framework consists of a number of overarching guidelines which define and describe key concepts of biosimilar development programmes. The overarching guidelines are complemented by product-specific guidelines, which give more detailed guidance to applicants in relation to the respective class of products.

The product-specific guideline for monoclonal antibodies has been in force since December 2012. As for all biosimilars, the emphasis in the development programme is on demonstrating comparability to the reference medicine. An applicant has to submit studies to the Agency that show that the medicine is a biosimilar of the reference medicine, i.e. that it does not have any meaningful differences from the reference medicine in terms of its quality, safety and efficacy.

Applicants are also required to implement a risk-management plan to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of a biosimilar, including the detection of any unexpected rare adverse effects when the medicine is used in clinical practice.

The CHMP opinions on Remsima and Inflectra will now be sent to the European Commission for adoption of a marketing-authorisation decision.


logo logo logo