ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

November 30, 2012

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

The paper titled ‘It’s all about the name: what is the imperative of adopting unique names for biologic and biosimilar therapeutics?’ explains the ASBM’s position that in order to ensure patient safety as biosimilars are approved in the US, they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

Read full article at Generics and Biosimilars Initiative (GaBI)


ASBM publishes paper on biosimilar naming

November 30, 2012

The US-based Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) announced on 28 November 2012 that its recommendations with respect to identification and substitution of biosimilars have been published in the Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) policy forum.

The paper titled ‘It’s all about the name: what is the imperative of adopting unique names for biologic and biosimilar therapeutics?’ explains the ASBM’s position that in order to ensure patient safety as biosimilars are approved in the US, they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

Read full article at Generics and Biosimilars Initiative (GaBI)


FDLI publishes ASBM White Paper on biosimilar naming

November 29, 2012

The Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) Policy Forum published a white paper on biosimilar naming authored by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM).

The white paper is titled, “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names for Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” and explains that biologic medicines are different than traditional chemical drugs, and present unique safety concerns to patients. Because of this fact the paper notes that in order to ensure patient-safety as biosimilars are approved in the U.S., they must be given unique, non-proprietary names.

Read the full article at Biosimilar News


ASBM Says Distinct USAN Names for Biosimilars are Needed

November 29, 2012

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (“ASBM“), a self-described “organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion,” urges FDA in a new paper to adopt unique non-proprietary names for all biological products licensed under the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”), and in particular biosimilar versions of reference products (even those that are interchangeable).

Read full article at FDA Law Blog


ASBM Says Distinct USAN Names for Biosimilars are Needed

November 29, 2012

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (“ASBM“), a self-described “organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion,” urges FDA in a new paper to adopt unique non-proprietary names for all biological products licensed under the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”), and in particular biosimilar versions of reference products (even those that are interchangeable).

Read full article at FDA Law Blog


ASBM Paper on Biosimilar Naming Published in the Food and Drug Law Institute’s Policy Forum

November 28, 2012

Unique names key factor to ensure patient-safety in biosimilar pathway

WASHINGTON – The Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) Policy Forum today published a white paper on biosimilar naming authored by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM). “It’s All About the Name: What is the Imperative of Adopting Unique Names For Biologic and Biosimilar Therapeutics?” explains that in order to ensure patient-safety as biosimilars are approved in the U.S., they must be given distinct, non-proprietary names. The paper identifies key challenges and practical solutions to help facilitate a solution to ensure safety is the cornerstone of the biosimilars pathway.

In the paper, ASBM makes four policy recommendations:

  1. All biologics should receive distinct non-proprietary names.
  2. United States Pharmacopeia (USP) should work with FDA to adapt the product monograph system to accommodate the unique attributes of structurally-related, but distinct, biologic medicines.
  3. The non-proprietary name of a reference product and product/s biosimilar to it should have a common, shared root but have distinct and differentiating suffixes.
  4. Products designated interchangeable should have a distinct name from the reference product for which they are considered interchangeable to facilitate accurate attribution of adverse events.

“As an organization, ASBM has been working with our diverse membership and Advisory Board that represents patients, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, manufacturers and academics to support the FDA as they work to bring biosimilars to patients in the U.S.,” said Dr. Richard Dolinar, ASBM Chairman. “Naming has been a prominent biosimilar safety issue and we are honored to be featured in FDLI’s publication and hope that this paper helps identify the challenges and solutions we need to take into consideration.”

FDLI’s Food and Drug Policy Forum is a concise (approximately 10 page), twice-a-month, peer-reviewed, digital publication on current food and drug policy topics. Posed in the form of a question, each issue provides subscribers and purchasers with pertinent background information, relevant research, a discussion of central issues, relevant resources, and policy recommendations.

Read the paper here.

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines
The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, innovative medical biotechnology companies, and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion. We serve as an authoritative resource center of information for the public, medical communities, the FDA and other state and federal policymakers during the implementation of the biosimilars pathway and beyond.

About the Food and Drug Law Institute
The Food and Drug Law Institute, founded in 1949, is a non-profit organization that provides a marketplace for discussing food and drug law issues through conferences, publications and member interaction. The scope of FDLI includes food, drugs, animal drugs, biologics, cosmetics, diagnostics, dietary supplements, medical devices and tobacco. As a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization, FDLI does not engage in advocacy activities. FDLI’s Mission is to provide education, training, and publications on topical food and drug law; act as a liaison to promote networking as a means to develop professional relationships and idea generation; and ensure an open, balanced marketplace of ideas to inform innovative public policy, law, and regulation.

 


Dr. Dolinar Quoted in November Issue of BioProcess International

November 15, 2012

In an article titled “Polysorbates, Immunogenicity, and the Totality of the Evidence” author Edward T. Maggio, quotes Dr. Dolinar’s testimony at the FDA pubic hearing, saying:

“Unwanted immunogenicity is the preeminent safety challenge associated with all biological therapeutics and can result in unexpected and sometimes severe adverse effects. Complicating matters, side-effects may only appear in patients after higher doses or prolonged duration of treatments and may be attributed to a number of patient, disease, or product related factors.”

Read the full article here.


ASBM Member Releases Position Statement on Substitution

November 7, 2012

The American Academy of Dermatology released a position statement on automatic substitution that calls for several thresholds to all be met before a biosimilar can be substituted. Read the statement here.


BIO Principles on Patient Safety in the Substitution of Biologic Products

October 29, 2012

In August, BIO released Principles on Substitution for Biologic Products. Read the Principles here.


ASBM Statement on Automatic Substitution

October 26, 2012

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in March 2010, contained a provision establishing an abbreviated pathway for the approval of biosimilars (also referred to as followon biologics, or subsequent entry biologics) in the U.S.

In February 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a set of three draft guidance documents on biosimilar product development to assist industry in developing such products in the U.S. The guidance documents outlined the FDA’s current thinking on key scientific and regulatory factors involved in submitting applications for biosimilar products to the agency but did not provide any insight on how the agency would handle, “interchangeable biosimilars.” In fact, the regulatory agency sent an unambiguous signal on this topic when it stated in the draft guidance “[t]his document is not intended to provide an overview of FDA’s approach to determining interchangeability because FDA is continuing to consider the type of information sufficient to enable FDA to determine that a biological product is interchangeable.”

On May 24, 2012 ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, M.D., convened a working group of Advisory Board members to discuss the elements of a physician notification policy for interchangeable biosimilars that prioritizes patient safety and protects the relationship between physicians and their patients but also respects the sovereignty of pharmacists as healthcare providers. As ASBM continues to work with stakeholders to develop an official position statement on this very important topic there are a few key principles that ASBM believes must be reflected in any policy recommendation:

(1) Physicians have the authority to specify “do not substitute” for biological products and that specification overrides any policy – e.g. by payers or state law – that would have substitution be the standard or default practice;

(2) Physicians and pharmacists should work collaboratively to ensure that the treating physician is aware of the exact biologic – by manufacturer – given to a patient in order to facilitate patient care and accurate attribution of any adverse events that may occurs; and

(3) The timing of the notification process must not impose an undue burden on the pharmacist and need not be in advance of a substitution being made but must be timely enough to facilitate accurate record keeping and attribution of adverse events by the physician.


logo logo logo