ASBM Forum Brings Together Leaders on Biosimilars Issues in 2014

March 6, 2014

On February 25, ASBM held a forum to educate patient advocates, physician groups and members of its International Advisory Board on the complex issues related to biosimilars.

 

The half-day forum entitled, “Ensuring Access to Safe Biosimilars: Policy Developments and Emerging Challenges” focused on the challenges facing world regulators including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the importance of distinguishable non-proprietary names for biosimilars and the value of and need for patient, physician and pharmacist education on issues related to biosimilars.

 

INTRODUCTORY VIDEO ON BIOSIMILARS
[jwplayer mediaid=”2082″]

Following opening remarks by ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, MD, this seven-minute video was shown, setting the stage for the day’s presentations and panels by answering some fundamental questions about biologic medicines: What are biologics? How do they help patients? How do they differ from chemical drugs? What are biosimilars? And what unique challenges do they present for regulators and policymakers?

 

PRESENTATION: ASBM ACTIVITY, 2011-2014
Michael S. Reilly, ASBM Executive Director
view presentation

ASBM Executive Director Michael S. Reilly reviews the regulatory history of biosimilars in the U.S., beginning with the Affordable Care Act’s creation of a biosimilar pathway, and the formation of ASBM in late 2010 as a means of offering guidance to FDA from a diverse group of patients, physicians, researchers, and industry stakeholders. Mr. Reilly outlines major projects of ASBM over the past few years and tracks its evolution from a primarily domestic advocacy group, into a voice for global standards governing the safety, efficacy, approval, and naming of biosimilars.

 

PRESENTATION: THE VALUE OF PATIENT ADVOCACY
Andrew Spiegel, ASBM Steering Committee Member and Co-executive Director of the Global Colon Cancer Association
view presentation

Mr. Spiegel discusses the value of patient advocacy, highlighting how ASBM has benefitted patients. Mr. Spiegel details his experience as a patient advocate including his work with patient groups around the world, and his advocacy to policymakers throughout the U.S. This presentation set the stage for the subsequent panel discussion featuring Mr. Spiegel, Marcia Horn, President of the International Cancer Advocacy Network, and Joseph Jefferson, Director of Advocacy and Alliance Development at HealthHIV. Brian Rye, Health Policy Analyst at Bloomberg Government, moderated the discussion.

 

PRESENTATION: REGULATORY CHALLENGES FOR THE FDA
Dirk Reitsma, MD, ASBM Advisory Board Member
view presentation

As the U.S. biosimilar pathway evolves, FDA continues to develop its guidance for biosimilar manufacturers, including what type of data a manufacturer will need to provide for a biosimilar to be determined as ‘interchangeable’, how clinical trials will need to be designed, and how well-understood the biosimilar’s mechanism of action must be to ensure quality and safety. ASBM International Advisory Board Member and oncology researcher Dirk Reitsma, MD gives a regulatory update and offers his thoughts on how current regulatory regimes in existence around the world may, or may not, impact FDA’s upcoming regulation.

 

PRESENTATION: DEVELOPING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR BIOSIMILARS
Kirsten Vadheim, PhD
view presentation

Approval of any medicine for patient use requires safety and efficacy data over time, to minimize the incidence of adverse events. In this presentation, former FDA regulator Kirsten Vadheim underscores the importance of these high standards for biologics in particular, due to their complexity and extreme sensitivity to minor manufacturing differences. Also examined are the efforts of several organizations around the world, including the World Health Organization (WHO) to build a shared, international framework of regulatory standards for biosimilars.

 

PANEL DISCUSSION: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO PHARMACOVIGILANCE
Richard Dolinar, MD, ASBM Chairman view presentation
Phil Schneider, Associate Dean, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy view presentation

Under what circumstances may a biosimilar be substituted for its reference biologic, either by a pharmacist, insurer, or another third party? What type of communication and record-keeping must occur between prescriber and pharmacist to ensure good tracking and tracing of adverse events? These are the questions with which many state lawmakers are grappling, as biosimilar substitution legislation is debated across the U.S.

In conjunction with a panel discussion moderated by Brian Rye of Bloomberg Government, ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, MD presented the physician’s perspective on biosimilar substitution, along with a brief legislative review and update about an increasingly more collaborative approach to biosimilar legislation.

ASBM International Advisory Board Member and Associate Dean of the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Phil Schneider in turn offers the pharmacist’s perspective, highlighting the common ground between physician and pharmacist, and areas where communication and cooperation could be improved.


ASBM Files Comments to the FTC

March 1, 2014

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines submitted comments to the Federal Trade Commission in regards to the “Follow-On Biosimilars Workshop: Impact of Recent Legislative and Regulatory Naming Proposals on Competition” hearing held in February. Read comments here.


Indiana Substitution Legislation Headed to Governor

February 27, 2014

Indiana Substitution Legislation Headed to Governor

In Indiana, Senate Bill 262, has successfully moved through both chambers of the legislature with a strong vote of 92-5 in the State House.    The legislation will now move to Governor Pence where it is hoped to quickly be considered.

ASBM has written Governor Pence in strong support of the enactment of this legislation stating, “We believe that when interchangeable biosimilar products are substituted, communication among patients, pharmacists, and health care providers is essential to patient care and, therefore, we fully support SB 262 and are concerned that patient safety will be compromised if this legislation is not enacted.”

To view legislation click here.

To view ASBM letter to Governor Pence click here.

 


January 2014 Newsletter

February 7, 2014

WHO’s Minutes Reflect INN Consideration of Separate Process for ‘Biologic Qualifiers’ for Biosimilars

As reported in Inside Health Policy’s “WHO Mulls ‘Biological Qualifier,’ Separate from INN, For Biosimilars,” minutes from the meeting held this past October in Geneva reflect the serious examination by World Health Organization to create a system for unique names.

ASBM chairman Richard Dolinar, MD and executive director Michael Reilly, were present at the October meeting. Dolinar gave formal comments during the stakeholder session advocating for a system requiring unique names. However, minutes also reflect that the European Medicines Agency stated, “it was ‘unlikely’ that a biological qualifier would be used in the European Union.”

“The April meeting is going to be really interesting,” state Michael Reilly in the January 31st article, who also noted that “WHO appears to be finding a compromise among the different positions on biosimilar naming.”


FTC Biosimilars Workshop

On February 4th, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held “Follow-On Biosimilars Workshop: Impact of Recent Legislative and Regulatory Naming Proposals on Competition,” in Washington, DC.

The workshop was rescheduled from its original date of December 10th due to inclement weather. The all day workshop focused on a host of issues including the impact state regulations may have on competition; how regulations could be structured to facilitate competition as well as safety; how naming may affect competition, and experiences in other countries. Unfortunately, no patient advocacy groups were scheduled to appear. However, many ASBM partners were in attendance.

The FTC will be accepting public comments through March 1, 2014. ASBM, as well as several other members, intend to submit formal comments.

To view comments from the workshop click here.

To view patient group release and letter to FTC click here.


States Consider Substitution Legislation Early in 2014

Language introduced in WA and IN may reflect a change to come in biosimilar substitution legislation under debate in several states as some generic companies indicate they will support state proposals.

Washington State

In the Washington State Legislature, biosimilars legislation — HB 2326 and SB 6091– have been introduced. Language in the legislation reflects ASBM principles, including provisions that authorize biosimilars be substituted in place of biologic products if the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the biosimilar product is interchangeable with the biologic product, and requires the dispensing pharmacist to record the name of the product and the manufacturer in a health records system that is shared with the prescribing provider or communicate it to the prescribing provider directly. It also requires the patient to be made aware of the substitution.

Both the House Health Care & Wellness Committee, and the Senate Health Care Committee have considered the legislation. Currently, the House Health Care & Wellness Committee has HB 2326 scheduled for executive session on February 5th.

To view legislation click here.

Indiana

In Indiana, Senate Bill 262, which is similar to language in WA, has successfully moved out of the Senate Health & Provider Services Committee and was passed out of the full Senate on January 28th by a vote of 38 to 11. The legislation has now moved over to the House where it is hoped to quickly be considered.

To view legislation click here.


IfPA Publishes Paper on Physician’s Perspective on Biologics

The Institute for Patient Access (IfPA) recently published a paper discussing the need for doctors to be notified of automatic substutions of biosimilar products — a debate currently under consideration in the States.

In the article, Dr. David Charles and Mary Ann Chapman, PhD promote the relationships doctors must maintain with their patients in order to optimize patient care and outcomes. Since biologics are not like chemically synthesized drugs and have large, complex structures difficult to characterize and therefore are not like generics, physicians need to be informed of substitutions that may take place at the pharmacy. Without notification, practitioners may not be able to trace any adverse events or lose critical time properly diagnosing any decline in patient health.

Read IfPA 3-pager here.


Dr. Dolinar to Give Keynote at Philadelphia Conference

ASBM chairman, Richard Dolinar, MD will give the keynote address at the Biosimilars and Follow-On Biologics 2014 Americas conference in Philadelphia, February 10-12.

The conference will focus on commercial opportunities and regulatory challenges in the biosimilars arena. Dr. Dolinar’s presentation will give a practitioner’s perspective and focus on the need for physician education on biosimilars and the importance of collaboration between physicians and pharmacists to ensure the quality of patient care.

For more details on the conference, click here.


Upcoming Conferences

The CBI 9th Annual Biosimilars Summit, March 19th-20th – Philadelphia, PA
12 EGA International Biosimilar Medicines Conference, April 3rd-4th -London, UK
Biosimilars and Biobetters USA Conference, April 7th-8th – Iselin, NJ
2014 FDLI Annual Conference, April 23rd -24th, Washington, DC


Opinion Article “As prescription drugs advance, doctors need all the details”

February 1, 2014

Opinion piece by Dr. Sol De Jesus in the Lebanon Daily News. Read here.


Opinion Article “As prescription drugs advance, doctors need all the details”

February 1, 2014

Opinion piece by Dr. Sol De Jesus in the Lebanon Daily News. Read here.


New IfPA publication on why doctors need to know when pharmacists substitute biologics.

January 17, 2014

“The Physician’s Perspective:  A health policy brief from the Institute for Patient Access,” discusses the importance of a doctor’s need to know when their patients are switched to a biosimilar –- an issue public policy makers in the states are currently considering.

Read more here.


New IfPA publication on why doctors need to know when pharmacists substitute biologics.

January 17, 2014

“The Physician’s Perspective:  A health policy brief from the Institute for Patient Access,” discusses the importance of a doctor’s need to know when their patients are switched to a biosimilar –- an issue public policy makers in the states are currently considering.

Read more here.


November/December 2013 Newsletter

December 19, 2013

ASBM Releases New European Survey in Dublin

On November 22, ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly presented preliminary findings of a new survey on European physicians’ views on biosimilar naming at the Drug Information Association (DIA) Biosimilars Workshop in Dublin, Ireland. The key findings showed that nonproprietary names matter to patient safety:

  • 53% of physicians surveyed felt that an identical nonproprietary name implies identical structure – which will not be the case for biosimilar medicines
  • 61% of surveyed physicians said that identical nonproprietary names imply that the medicines are approved for the same indications – which is not necessarily the case
  • 24% of reporting physicians record only the nonproprietary name of the biological product in the patient record

Read more on the survey here.


FDA Week Features Story on European Survey

In the FDA Week story “ASBM Uses European Biosimilar Naming Survey To Push Unique Names” Alaina Busch quotes ASBM on the release of the survey:

“‘The consistency of physician perspective in the U.S. and Europe with regard to nonproprietary naming of biologics is striking,” said ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly, who presented the findings during a Drug Information Association biosimilar workshop in Ireland. ‘Identical nonproprietary names are generally understood to mean that the products are both identical and approved for the same indications — incorrect and potentially unsafe assumptions for biologics.’

“ASBM, also points out that physicians in Europe have hands-on experience with biosimilars, as opposed to doctors in the United States, where biosimilars have not yet been approved.”‘


Brookings Panel on Biologics

ASBM Chairman Richard Dolinar, MD and Executive Director Michael Reilly participated in the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution “Developing Systems to Support Pharmacovigilance of Biologic Products” forum on November 15, in Washington, D.C.

Mark B. McClellan, the Director of Health Care Innovation and Value Initiative for Brookings, moderated the panel “Potential Strategies to Identify Biologics for Safety Surveillance.”

Read more here.


Dr. Dolinar Interviewed on WFAS NYC

On November 21, Dr. Dolinar was interviewed on WFAS 1230 talk radio by guest host Seth Ginsberg of the Global Healthy Living Foundation. Dr. Dolinar gave an overview of what biosimilars are and the impact they will have on patients and physicians once they are approved in the U.S. WFAS AM 1230 is broadcast across the greater New York City area and reaches over a million listeners!

Listen to the interview here.


FTC Biosimilars Workshop to be Rescheduled

The FTC canceled the Biosimilars and Interchangeables Workshop on December 10, in Washington, D.C. due to inclement weather. Dr. Dolinar and seven ASBM Members were prepared to attend. The workshop has been rescheduled for February 4, 2014.

The FTC will be accepting public comments through March 1, 2014.

Read more here.


AfPA Working Group on Biologics

The Alliance for Patient Access (AfPA) held their National Physicians Biologics Working Group Meeting on November 15-16 in Chicago, IL where Dr. Dolinar gave the keynote address to attending physicians. In his address, Dr. Dolinar discussed the current state of biosimilars and explained the disconnect between the science and potential policies and how they will impact patient safety.

View the presentation here.


Upcoming Conferences

  • Dr. Dolinar will give the keynote address at the Biosimilars and Follow-On Biologics 2014 Americas conference, which will be in Philadelphia, February 10-12
  • The CBI 9th Annual Biosimilars Summit will also be held in Philadelphia, March 19-20

ASBM Presents New European Survey Findings on Biosimilars and the Importance of Nonproprietary Naming

November 22, 2013

Dublin, Ireland – The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) today released the results of a new survey on European physicians’ views on biosimilar naming. ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly presented the findings at the Drug Information Association (DIA) Biosimilars Workshop in Dublin, Ireland. The key findings showed that nonproprietary names matter to patient safety.

The survey examined responses from more than 470 prescribers located in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The respondents included nephrologists, rheumatologists, dermatologists, neurologists, endocrinologists, and oncologists – all specialties that prescribe biologics.

Key findings from the survey include:

  • 53% of physicians surveyed felt that an identical nonproprietary name implies identical structure – which will not be the case for biosimilar medicines
  • 61% of surveyed physicians said that identical nonproprietary names imply that the medicines are approved for the same indications – which is not necessarily the case
  • 24% of reporting physicians record only the non-proprietary name of the biological product in the patient record

In September 2012, ASBM conducted a similar survey that examined practices and perspectives on biosimilar naming and substitution of over 350 physicians in the U.S. The survey was intended to provide data to help support the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as they determine biosimilar policies that will have a fundamental impact on patient safety.

Unlike physicians in the U.S., where biosimilars are not yet available, the perspective of European physicians reflects hands-on clinical experience with biosimilars in a therapeutic setting.

The responses of the European physicians demonstrate the need for distinguishable nonproprietary names to be given for all biologics. Biosimilars, in contrast to generic drugs, may have different structure and therapeutic profile, and be approved for different indications than the reference product.

In his presentation, Reilly noted the commonality of physicians’ views across the ocean despite the significant difference in their respective experience with biosimilars since biosimilars have been on the market in Europe for several years but are not yet approved in the U.S.

“The consistency of physician perspective in the U.S. and Europe with regard to nonproprietary naming of biologics is striking.  Identical nonproprietary names are generally understood to mean that the products are both identical and approved for the same indications – incorrect and potentially unsafe assumptions for biologics.

“More and more biologic medicines, both innovative and biosimilar, are being approved around the world.  How these products are named will clearly play an important role in facilitating global pharmacovigilance and the safe use of these medicines.”

Both surveys were conducted by Industry Standard Research. European Survey data will be shared in the participating countries following the upcoming holiday season.

About the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines

The Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) is an organization composed of diverse healthcare groups and individuals from patients to physicians, biotechnology companies that develop innovative and biosimilar medicines and others who are working together to ensure patient safety is at the forefront of the biosimilars policy discussion.

For more information, please contact:

Michael Reilly

Executive Director

Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines

Phone: 202-222-8326

E: Michael@safebiologics.org


logo logo logo