FDA Finalizes Guidance on Biosimilar Development

November 2, 2021

In October, the FDA finalized its guidance document “Questions and Answers on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act: Guidance for Industry”, addressing additional questions and answers related to biosimilar development. This is the second such revision to the guidance.

The update added five questions, including:

  • Sponsor responsibilities related to pediatric assessments for proposed biosimilar products
  • The types of information needed to support post-approval manufacturing changes
  • Clarification that sponsors may not seek approval for a biosimilar with a different route of administration, dosage form, or strength than the reference product
  • Clarification that biosimilars cannot be approved for conditions of use that have not previously been approved for the reference product.
  • An explanation that sponsors should provide data and information to support the approval of a proposed biosimilar for an indication still covered by unexpired or orphan exclusivity (though the indication will not be approved until the orphan exclusivity expires).

In addition, several questions were withdrawn, while others underwent minor editorial changes.

Learn more about the updated guidance here. 

Read the guidance here. 


Help Celebrate the First National Biologic Coordinator’s Day

November 1, 2021

nbcd_logo_darkbluebackground_finalToday, November 1st, is the First National Biologic Coordinator’s Day. 

Starting and staying on a prescribed biologic treatment can be a complex process for patients—but it doesn’t always have to be. Thanks to the tireless work of BIOLOGIC COORDINATORS, patients are able to access their prescribed biologic treatments.

A biologic coordinator is a key member of a medical practice’s office staff–a doctor, nurse, physician’s assistant, medical assistant or an office/practice manager–that helps patients navigate the complex process of obtaining access to prescribed biologic medications.

Biologic coordinators are important patient advocates in healthcare—yet too often, their work goes unrecognized.

Show your support today for Biologic Coordinators by using the hashtags #NationalBiologicCoordinatorsDay and/or #BeCauseYouCare!

Learn more about the importance of Biologic Coordinators
by downloading this educational fact sheet:


ASBM Presents at WHO’s 73rd INN Consultation

October 25, 2021

On October 19th, ASBM participated in the World Health Organization’s 73rd Consultation on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances, held in Geneva, Switzerland. This was the seventeenth INN Consultation in which ASBM has participated.

ASBM was represented by Executive Director Michael Reilly, Esq., and Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider, MS, FASHP.

While the discussions at the INN Consultation are confidential pending publication of an Executive Summary by the INN Programme, the Executive Summary from the 72nd INN Consultation – held April 13th, 2021 and in which ASBM also participated – may be viewed here. From that report:

“Many published reports, including ASBM’s own surveys of prescribers over several years, show a clear lack of identification of the brand name in ADR reports, especially in the EU in which brand name reporting became a mandatory requirement in 2012.”

“ASBM highlighted that reporting on brand names in ADR reports continues to be inadequate despite widespread recognition of its importance. WHO has identified a lack of a naming standard as a regulatory challenge that undermines the strong pharmacovigilance needed for biologics and biosimilars, and ASBM underlined that the WHO has the ability and the duty to make a global standard available to address this global pharmacovigilance need.”

Since 2013, ASBM has worked extensively on the issue of international harmonization of biologic nomenclature, including holding a series of meetings with FDA, Health Canada, and the WHO on the subject.

Read more about ASBM’s work with the WHO’s INN Group here. 


ASBM Presents Third Biosimilars Course with LIU-Pharmacy

September 30, 2021

On September 28th, ASBM Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider presented an online Continuing Education (CE) course entitled the “The State of the Biosimilars Market in 2021”. The course was presented in conjunction with Long Island University College of Pharmacy and is the third in the series “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”. The series is accredited by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE).

In the presentation, Dr. Schneider discussed the potential economic benefits of biosimilars, and examined different approaches countries around the world have used for driving their uptake.  While some countries experimented with forced substitution of government-preferred products, those with the most successful biosimilars markets permitted physicians to retain control over prescribing decisions. These countries achieved savings through the increased competition of many products being freely available and reimbursed by payers.

Dr. Schneider also discussed patient and physician concerns with the non-medical switching of patients who are stable on their current therapies; and  how the U.S. interchangeability standard addresses these concerns.

View the latest course here. 

View the first course in the series here: “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”.

View the second course in the series here: “Substitution and Non-Medical Switching”


ASBM Presents Third Biosimilars Course with LIU-Pharmacy

September 30, 2021

On September 28th, ASBM Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider presented an online Continuing Education (CE) course entitled the “The State of the Biosimilars Market in 2021”. The course was presented in conjunction with Long Island University College of Pharmacy and is the third in the series “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”. The series is accredited by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE).

In the presentation, Dr. Schneider discussed the potential economic benefits of biosimilars, and examined different approaches countries around the world have used for driving their uptake.  While some countries experimented with forced substitution of government-preferred products, those with the most successful biosimilars markets permitted physicians to retain control over prescribing decisions. These countries achieved savings through the increased competition of many products being freely available and reimbursed by payers.

Dr. Schneider also discussed patient and physician concerns with the non-medical switching of patients who are stable on their current therapies; and  how the U.S. interchangeability standard addresses these concerns.

View the latest course here. 

View the first course in the series here: “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”.

View the second course in the series here: “Substitution and Non-Medical Switching”


Michael Reilly Op-eds in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick: Forced Switching Puts Provinces on Wrong Track

September 30, 2021

During the months of September and October, three op-eds by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly ran in numerous Canadian papers throughout Quebec, New Brunswick, and Ontario. Quebec and New Brunswick recently announced they would be adopting forced biosimilar switching policies. Ontario has considered, but not yet implemented such a move.

Read the Quebec op-ed here (French)
Read the New Brunswick op-ed here (English)
Read the Ontario op-ed here (English). 

From the op-eds:

A survey of 403 Canadian specialists found that 73% are uncomfortable with a third party initiating a biologic switch for non-medical reasons (typically the cost), as occurs in the British Columbia and Alberta policies. These findings were affirmed by Quebec’s own government (INESSS) in a May 2020 report which concluded that “Non-medical switching in patients being treated with a reference biologic is generally not accepted by learned societies and the consulted clinicians.”

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) released a paper objecting to the B.C. policy; noting that BC Pharmacare’s substitution policy went against the recommendations of 14 gastroenterology societies throughout Canada and Europe. Many patient advocacy organizations also opposed these policies, including the Gastrointestinal Society and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada.

“It was a very long, difficult 2 1/2 year journey to find [the originally-prescribed] drug. All other drugs failed,” said one B.C. arthritis patient who was forced to switch. “I am shocked and appalled that this government is taking the decision away from physicians and patients, where it belongs.”

The New Brunswick and Quebec announcements cited 15 years of experience with biosimilars in Europe to justify forced switching. However, as the op-ed explains:

Automatic substitution of biologics is almost universally prohibited in Europe. In nearly every European country, physicians are free to choose between multiple products, including the originators, and the payer will reimburse them – resulting in both high biosimilar usage and high savings while preserving patient and physician control of treatment decisions.

 

Read ASBM’s new whitepaper “A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada”. This paper highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. 


GaBI Journal Publishes Critical Review of Canadian Substitution Policies

September 30, 2021

On September 30th, the Generics and Biosimilars Initiative published GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3, containing a new whitepaper by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly and Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider.

The paper is entitled A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada” and highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. From the paper:

Successful biosimilar markets in the EU and US have demonstrated that forced medical switching is unnecessary to achieve high uptake of biosimilars and the associated savings...This fosters a robust and sustainable biosimilar market with multiple suppliers in any given product class.

Canada desires a robust biosimilar market share like that observed in Europe. While there may be short-term savings from non-medical switching, a long-term consequence of this policy may be decreased competition resulting from fewer products launches and a negative impact on patient safety. Potential drug shortage issues may develop in the absence of multiple suppliers of biologics in each product class. There would also be likely be an undermining the confidence of both physicians and patients in biosimilars that creates an additional barrier to biosimilar uptake.

The successful uptake of biosimilars in Europe was accomplished by limiting the choice of biologic or forced non-medical switching, but through preserving choice for physicians and patients and by promoting competition among all products approved by regulatory authorities. To foster its success in creating a sustainable biosimilars market, Canadian payers can learn from the lessons learned in more mature markets and implement evidence-based transition policies that consider patients’ needs primary.

Read GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3 online here.


GaBI Journal Publishes Critical Review of Canadian Substitution Policies

September 30, 2021

On September 30th, the Generics and Biosimilars Initiative published GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3, containing a new whitepaper by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly and Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider.

The paper is entitled A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada” and highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. From the paper:

Successful biosimilar markets in the EU and US have demonstrated that forced medical switching is unnecessary to achieve high uptake of biosimilars and the associated savings...This fosters a robust and sustainable biosimilar market with multiple suppliers in any given product class.

Canada desires a robust biosimilar market share like that observed in Europe. While there may be short-term savings from non-medical switching, a long-term consequence of this policy may be decreased competition resulting from fewer products launches and a negative impact on patient safety. Potential drug shortage issues may develop in the absence of multiple suppliers of biologics in each product class. There would also be likely be an undermining the confidence of both physicians and patients in biosimilars that creates an additional barrier to biosimilar uptake.

The successful uptake of biosimilars in Europe was accomplished by limiting the choice of biologic or forced non-medical switching, but through preserving choice for physicians and patients and by promoting competition among all products approved by regulatory authorities. To foster its success in creating a sustainable biosimilars market, Canadian payers can learn from the lessons learned in more mature markets and implement evidence-based transition policies that consider patients’ needs primary.

Read GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3 online here.


September 2021

September 30, 2021

ASBM Welcomes Ralph McKibbin, MD as Chairman

 

In a Full Member Call September 9th, ASBM introduced gastroenterologist Ralph McKibbin, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF as the organization’s incoming chairman. Dr. McKibbin began his three year term on September 1st, succeeding outgoing chair Madelaine Feldman, MD, FACR. Dr. McKibbin is the fourth chairman since ASBM was founded in 2010.

 

A practicing gastroenterologist in Altoona, PA, Dr. McKibbin is past president of both the Pennsylvania Society of Gastroenterology and of the Digestive Disease National Coalition (DDNC). He has written extensively on the issues of non-medical switching and insurance industry utilization management techniques including step therapy and copay accumulator adjustments. He recently served as the lead author on the DDNC paper “Patient Access To Care And Treatments In The Cost-Shifting Era: Preserving the Patient-Provider Decision-Making Relationship” and authored an op-ed in support of a Pennsylvania bill to restrict non-medical switching and similar practices such as mid-year benefit changes.
“Biosimilars are a helpful tool in controlling health costs,” said Dr. McKibbin. “It is also important to me that my patients are able to maintain control over their condition without unnecessary or inappropriate switching. ASBM has worked for more than a decade to ensure patients have access to these new treatment options without compromising on safety, efficacy or quality; I look forward to working with them over the next three years to advance that mission.”

 

Read ASBM’s full announcement about Dr. McKIbbin here. 

 

 

GaBI Journal Publishes Critical Review of Canadian Substitution Policies

 

On September 30th, the Generics and Biosimilars Initiative published GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3, containing a new whitepaper by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly and Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider.

 

The paper is entitled A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada” and highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. From the paper:

 

Successful biosimilar markets in the EU and US have demonstrated that forced medical switching is unnecessary to achieve high uptake of biosimilars and the associated savings...This fosters a robust and sustainable biosimilar market with multiple suppliers in any given product class.

 

Canada desires a robust biosimilar market share like that observed in Europe. While there may be short-term savings from non-medical switching, a long-term consequence of this policy may be decreased competition resulting from fewer products launches and a negative impact on patient safety. Potential drug shortage issues may develop in the absence of multiple suppliers of biologics in each product class. There would also be likely be an undermining the confidence of both physicians and patients in biosimilars that creates an additional barrier to biosimilar uptake.

 

The successful uptake of biosimilars in Europe was accomplished by limiting the choice of biologic or forced non-medical switching, but through preserving choice for physicians and patients and by promoting competition among all products approved by regulatory authorities. To foster its success in creating a sustainable biosimilars market, Canadian payers can learn from the lessons learned in more mature markets and implement evidence-based transition policies that consider patients’ needs primary.

 

Read GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3 online here.

 

 

 

Michael Reilly Op-eds: Forced Biosimilar Switching Puts Canadian Provinces on Wrong Track

 

During the month of September, two op-eds by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly ran in numerous Canadian papers throughout Quebec and New Brunswick. Both provinces recently announced they would be adopting forced biosimilar switching policies. From the op-eds:

 

A survey of 403 Canadian specialists found that 73% are uncomfortable with a third party initiating a biologic switch for non-medical reasons (typically the cost), as occurs in the British Columbia and Alberta policies. These findings were affirmed by Quebec’s own government (INESSS) in a May 2020 report which concluded that “Non-medical switching in patients being treated with a reference biologic is generally not accepted by learned societies and the consulted clinicians.”

 

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) released a paper objecting to the B.C. policy; noting that BC Pharmacare’s substitution policy went against the recommendations of 14 gastroenterology societies throughout Canada and Europe. Many patient advocacy organizations also opposed these policies, including the Gastrointestinal Society and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada.

 

“It was a very long, difficult 2 1/2 year journey to find [the originally-prescribed] drug. All other drugs failed,” said one B.C. arthritis patient who was forced to switch. “I am shocked and appalled that this government is taking the decision away from physicians and patients, where it belongs.”

 

The New Brunswick and Quebec announcements cited 15 years of experience with biosimilars in Europe to justify forced switching. However, as the op-ed explains:

 

Automatic substitution of biologics is almost universally prohibited in Europe. In nearly every European country, physicians are free to choose between multiple products, including the originators, and the payer will reimburse them – resulting in both high biosimilar usage and high savings while preserving patient and physician control of treatment decisions.

 

Read the Quebec op-ed here (French)
Read the New Brunswick op-ed here (English). 

 

Read ASBM’s new whitepaper “A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada”. This paper highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. 

 

 

FDA Approves 30th Biosimilar, First for Macular Degeneration

 

On September 17th, the FDA approved Byooviz (ranibizumab-nuna) as the first biosimilar to Lucentis (ranibizumab injection) for the treatment of several eye diseases and conditions, including neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), a leading cause of vision loss and blindness for Americans aged 65 years and older.

 

Byooviz is also approved to treat macular edema (fluid build-up) following retinal vein occlusion (blockage of veins in the retina) and myopic choroidal neovascularization, a vision-threatening complication of myopia (nearsightedness).

 

“Today’s approval provides another treatment option for millions of people whose vision is impaired and is another step forward in our commitment to provide access to safe, effective and high-quality biological products,” said Sarah Yim, M.D., director of the Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

 

“Continuing to grow the number of biosimilar approvals is a key part of our efforts to provide greater access to treatment options for patients, increase competition and potentially lower costs.”

 

Read more about the approval here.

 

 

ASBM Presents Third Biosimilars Course with LIU-Pharmacy

 

On September 28th, ASBM Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider presented an online Continuing Education (CE) course entitled the “The State of the Biosimilars Market in 2021”. The course was presented in conjunction with Long Island University College of Pharmacy and is the third in the series “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”. The series is accredited by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE).

 

In the presentation, Dr. Schneider discussed the potential economic benefits of biosimilars, and examined different approaches countries around the world have used for driving their uptake.  While some countries experimented with forced substitution of government-preferred products, those with the most successful biosimilars markets permitted physicians to retain control over prescribing decisions. These countries achieved savings through the increased competition of many products being freely available and reimbursed by payers.

 

Dr. Schneider also discussed patient and physician concerns with the non-medical switching of patients who are stable on their current therapies; and  how the U.S. interchangeability standard addresses these concerns.

 

View the latest course here. 

 

View the first course in the series here: “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”.

 

View the second course in the series here: “Substitution and Non-Medical Switching”

 

 

Reminder: Gastrointestinal Society Surveys Alberta and BC Patients on Non-Medical Switching 

 

The Canada-based Gastrointestinal Society has designed a brief survey to capture the biosimilar switching experience in Alberta and British Columbia, two Canadian provinces which have enacted forced biosimilar switching policies. In these provinces, the policy was changed to only provide public coverage for the biosimilar and no longer provides any coverage for the originator biologic.

 

The survey is open to residents of Alberta and British Columbia who were prescribed an originator biologic but were made to switch to a biosimilar based on government policy changes. Patient caregivers are also eligible. The survey covers these disease indications:

 

  • ankylosing spondylitis
  • Crohn’s disease
  • hidradenitis suppurativa
  • psoriasis
  • psoriatic arthritis
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • ulcerative colitis

Eligible Alberta and British Columbia patients and caregivers are encouraged to complete the survey here.

 

 

UPCOMING ASBM EVENTS

 

WHO 73rd INN Consultation

Geneva, Switzerland – October 19, 2021

 

World Drug Safety Congress Americas

Boston, Massachusetts – October 20-21, 2021

 

World Biosimilar Congress Europe 2021

Basel, Switzerland – November 9-11, 2021

 

World Biosimilar Congress USA 2022

San Diego, California – March 9-11, 2022

 


September 2021

September 30, 2021

ASBM Welcomes Ralph McKibbin, MD as Chairman

 

In a Full Member Call September 9th, ASBM introduced gastroenterologist Ralph McKibbin, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF as the organization’s incoming chairman. Dr. McKibbin began his three year term on September 1st, succeeding outgoing chair Madelaine Feldman, MD, FACR. Dr. McKibbin is the fourth chairman since ASBM was founded in 2010.

 

A practicing gastroenterologist in Altoona, PA, Dr. McKibbin is past president of both the Pennsylvania Society of Gastroenterology and of the Digestive Disease National Coalition (DDNC). He has written extensively on the issues of non-medical switching and insurance industry utilization management techniques including step therapy and copay accumulator adjustments. He recently served as the lead author on the DDNC paper “Patient Access To Care And Treatments In The Cost-Shifting Era: Preserving the Patient-Provider Decision-Making Relationship” and authored an op-ed in support of a Pennsylvania bill to restrict non-medical switching and similar practices such as mid-year benefit changes.
“Biosimilars are a helpful tool in controlling health costs,” said Dr. McKibbin. “It is also important to me that my patients are able to maintain control over their condition without unnecessary or inappropriate switching. ASBM has worked for more than a decade to ensure patients have access to these new treatment options without compromising on safety, efficacy or quality; I look forward to working with them over the next three years to advance that mission.”

 

Read ASBM’s full announcement about Dr. McKIbbin here. 

 

 

GaBI Journal Publishes Critical Review of Canadian Substitution Policies

 

On September 30th, the Generics and Biosimilars Initiative published GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3, containing a new whitepaper by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly and Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider.

 

The paper is entitled A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada” and highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. From the paper:

 

Successful biosimilar markets in the EU and US have demonstrated that forced medical switching is unnecessary to achieve high uptake of biosimilars and the associated savings...This fosters a robust and sustainable biosimilar market with multiple suppliers in any given product class.

 

Canada desires a robust biosimilar market share like that observed in Europe. While there may be short-term savings from non-medical switching, a long-term consequence of this policy may be decreased competition resulting from fewer products launches and a negative impact on patient safety. Potential drug shortage issues may develop in the absence of multiple suppliers of biologics in each product class. There would also be likely be an undermining the confidence of both physicians and patients in biosimilars that creates an additional barrier to biosimilar uptake.

 

The successful uptake of biosimilars in Europe was accomplished by limiting the choice of biologic or forced non-medical switching, but through preserving choice for physicians and patients and by promoting competition among all products approved by regulatory authorities. To foster its success in creating a sustainable biosimilars market, Canadian payers can learn from the lessons learned in more mature markets and implement evidence-based transition policies that consider patients’ needs primary.

 

Read GaBI Journal, Volume 10, 2021, Issue 3 online here.

 

 

 

Michael Reilly Op-eds: Forced Biosimilar Switching Puts Canadian Provinces on Wrong Track

 

During the month of September, two op-eds by ASBM Executive Director Michael Reilly ran in numerous Canadian papers throughout Quebec and New Brunswick. Both provinces recently announced they would be adopting forced biosimilar switching policies. From the op-eds:

 

A survey of 403 Canadian specialists found that 73% are uncomfortable with a third party initiating a biologic switch for non-medical reasons (typically the cost), as occurs in the British Columbia and Alberta policies. These findings were affirmed by Quebec’s own government (INESSS) in a May 2020 report which concluded that “Non-medical switching in patients being treated with a reference biologic is generally not accepted by learned societies and the consulted clinicians.”

 

The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) released a paper objecting to the B.C. policy; noting that BC Pharmacare’s substitution policy went against the recommendations of 14 gastroenterology societies throughout Canada and Europe. Many patient advocacy organizations also opposed these policies, including the Gastrointestinal Society and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada.

 

“It was a very long, difficult 2 1/2 year journey to find [the originally-prescribed] drug. All other drugs failed,” said one B.C. arthritis patient who was forced to switch. “I am shocked and appalled that this government is taking the decision away from physicians and patients, where it belongs.”

 

The New Brunswick and Quebec announcements cited 15 years of experience with biosimilars in Europe to justify forced switching. However, as the op-ed explains:

 

Automatic substitution of biologics is almost universally prohibited in Europe. In nearly every European country, physicians are free to choose between multiple products, including the originators, and the payer will reimburse them – resulting in both high biosimilar usage and high savings while preserving patient and physician control of treatment decisions.

 

Read the Quebec op-ed here (French)
Read the New Brunswick op-ed here (English). 

 

Read ASBM’s new whitepaper “A Critical Review of Substitution Policy for Biosimilars in Canada”. This paper highlights the stark contrast between the forced-substitution policies recently enacted by some Canadian provinces and the pro-competition policies which have proven successful in driving biosimilar uptake in Europe and the U.S. 

 

 

FDA Approves 30th Biosimilar, First for Macular Degeneration

 

On September 17th, the FDA approved Byooviz (ranibizumab-nuna) as the first biosimilar to Lucentis (ranibizumab injection) for the treatment of several eye diseases and conditions, including neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), a leading cause of vision loss and blindness for Americans aged 65 years and older.

 

Byooviz is also approved to treat macular edema (fluid build-up) following retinal vein occlusion (blockage of veins in the retina) and myopic choroidal neovascularization, a vision-threatening complication of myopia (nearsightedness).

 

“Today’s approval provides another treatment option for millions of people whose vision is impaired and is another step forward in our commitment to provide access to safe, effective and high-quality biological products,” said Sarah Yim, M.D., director of the Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

 

“Continuing to grow the number of biosimilar approvals is a key part of our efforts to provide greater access to treatment options for patients, increase competition and potentially lower costs.”

 

Read more about the approval here.

 

 

ASBM Presents Third Biosimilars Course with LIU-Pharmacy

 

On September 28th, ASBM Advisory Board Chair Philip Schneider presented an online Continuing Education (CE) course entitled the “The State of the Biosimilars Market in 2021”. The course was presented in conjunction with Long Island University College of Pharmacy and is the third in the series “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”. The series is accredited by the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education (ACPE).

 

In the presentation, Dr. Schneider discussed the potential economic benefits of biosimilars, and examined different approaches countries around the world have used for driving their uptake.  While some countries experimented with forced substitution of government-preferred products, those with the most successful biosimilars markets permitted physicians to retain control over prescribing decisions. These countries achieved savings through the increased competition of many products being freely available and reimbursed by payers.

 

Dr. Schneider also discussed patient and physician concerns with the non-medical switching of patients who are stable on their current therapies; and  how the U.S. interchangeability standard addresses these concerns.

 

View the latest course here. 

 

View the first course in the series here: “Biosimilars: What Pharmacists Need to Know”.

 

View the second course in the series here: “Substitution and Non-Medical Switching”

 

 

Reminder: Gastrointestinal Society Surveys Alberta and BC Patients on Non-Medical Switching 

 

The Canada-based Gastrointestinal Society has designed a brief survey to capture the biosimilar switching experience in Alberta and British Columbia, two Canadian provinces which have enacted forced biosimilar switching policies. In these provinces, the policy was changed to only provide public coverage for the biosimilar and no longer provides any coverage for the originator biologic.

 

The survey is open to residents of Alberta and British Columbia who were prescribed an originator biologic but were made to switch to a biosimilar based on government policy changes. Patient caregivers are also eligible. The survey covers these disease indications:

 

  • ankylosing spondylitis
  • Crohn’s disease
  • hidradenitis suppurativa
  • psoriasis
  • psoriatic arthritis
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • ulcerative colitis

Eligible Alberta and British Columbia patients and caregivers are encouraged to complete the survey here.

 

 

UPCOMING ASBM EVENTS

 

WHO 73rd INN Consultation

Geneva, Switzerland – October 19, 2021

 

World Drug Safety Congress Americas

Boston, Massachusetts – October 20-21, 2021

 

World Biosimilar Congress Europe 2021

Basel, Switzerland – November 9-11, 2021

 

World Biosimilar Congress USA 2022

San Diego, California – March 9-11, 2022

 


logo logo logo